An Unashamed Plea to Consider Contemporary Worship…
in the same way we consider, plan, and design traditional
worship.
This post grew out of an email to Josh Thomas, the Lay Vicar
of a beautiful offering of daily morning and evening prayer. In a shameless
plug for the website, it is www.dailyoffice.org.
The website offers daily morning and evening prayer from the Episcopal Book of Common Prayer and incorporates
other resources such as canticles from Enriching
Our Worship, U-tube clips and music from a variety of sources and genres. I
have been using the site for some time and am an overdue contributor. (My check
is in the virtual mail, Josh!)
I answered a comment Josh made about only knowing one
Episcopal Church that routinely used screens during their worship services. My
comment, and subsequent longer second comment at dailyoffice.org got me
thinking about my various experiences with contemporary worship. This post
should probably have a warning label, just as some sermons should carry one.
Caution: May be offensive. However, I will herewith post my musings about
contemporary worship and music.
First, I believe there is a danger of making a congregation
into an audience. I hear much more joking around – and it really is joking –
from clergy and lay people alike prior to a contemporary service. Please understand
that I think humor can be appropriate, but the level of humor I hear prior to
contemporary services all seem metaphorically related to an audience and actors
in a theatre or some kind of musical production. The following come to mind
easily: “It’s show time!” rather than a prayer before exiting the sacristy.
“We’re getting ready for the big tent.” “Let’s get on with the ‘shew’.” And
even, “Okay, on stage everyone.”
Secondly, I have noticed in several places that the
contemporary worship service tends to die off or disappear when a particular
clergy person departs the church. It generally is the person who saw a need for
the service or “built” the service by attracting people. Clergy come and go,
and parishioners do the same if they are particularly attached to a clergy
person. Admittedly, without any statistical analysis, it seems to me the
service is often built around a charismatic person. The people who attend the
service are never really incorporated into the parish as a whole. People bond
with the priest rather than the parish. I do know of places where it is
different, so please understand this is not meant as criticism of some
excellent contemporary services that currently exist.
In addition, the level of education and deepening of faith
seems to be missing at times. People come to worship and that’s it. While this
certainly happens at other services as well, I think often the theology of the
contemporary liturgies and music, especially those written by individuals
rather than by a liturgical body, support an individualistic type of worship. It’s
a sort of coming for my worship “fix” and then going home to live my life
unchanged. Much of contemporary music strikes me as being rather “I, Me, Mine,”
focused on personal salvation rather than the common prayer that takes place in
much of the more traditional music and liturgies that has lasted through the
centuries.
I also find that parishioners often expect to “fix” their
contemporary service if a new priest is younger than the previous priest. I
frankly haven’t seen much of a relationship between the age of the priest and
whether or not a contemporary service thrives.
Right now, many people in the Episcopal Church are trying to
figure out just where technology fits in with how we worship. In my limited
experience as a vocational interim – nine parishes in thirteen years and four
parishes with contemporary worship services – these are some of the things I
learned about successful contemporary worship services.
·
All service planning must acknowledge everyone
has a different definition of "contemporary" and gain agreement and
define it so everyone on the design team can be satisfied. Notice: I do not say it should satisfy everyone who
says they want a contemporary worship service.
·
Excellence is essential. So often I see
contemporary worship with untrained musicians, half-hearted clergy, lack-luster
participation and sloppy projection and sound systems. All of that combines to
make sloppy liturgy. Offer your best to God! If you do not have the resources
to do something well, you haven’t any business doing it at all. Be patient. If
it is really what your church is called to do, the resources will come together.
·
Pay close attention to any passivity on the part
of service attendees. One of the major gifts of the Episcopal Church is
participatory and common worship.
Contemporary service needs to be more than entertainment. People need to
pray and sing, to join in with the liturgy in a meaningful way. I think in the
contemporary genre you have to work really hard to see the worship stays God-centred,
participatory and grace oriented.
·
Be wise about deciding that because the church
needs young people, then all young people must want contemporary music. Actually talk to some young people who
currently don’t attend church and see what would make them come.
·
Be careful about deciding to do a contemporary
service because the church has grown or because a small group is pressuring the
church to do so. You might be ignoring the statistical wisdom that says when
it's simple overcrowding, add another service that is more of what you already
do well. (This is at the stage of adding a third service because the other two
services are at 75-80% capacity.)
·
Decide carefully what type of service you add when
you have 3 thriving services and want to add a fourth service to bring in new
people. That may well be the time to start something different, but talk to
people who do not attend the church rather than parishioners who do. People may
be longing for something completely different than you had in mind. It might be
sung candlelit Compline or Celtic liturgy, or some other forms that lets you still
build on what you do well.
·
Check for openness in the congregation to the
type of worship you are planning, especially among parish leaders. Will people
actually invite friends and neighbours who don't attend church to go with them
to the service? If Vestry and other leaders have to be persuaded to show up and
consider it a "duty" to be got through, rather than an opportunity to
experience something different, you may wish to reconsider. Once again, if your
leadership does not wholeheartedly support the service, you may wish to
reconsider. And not just support with their mouths, but also with their
presence, prayers, and inviting mentions of the service and what it offers.
Four other important items:
"Contemporary" music often ends up
being picked by baby boomers so the music is nostalgic rather than current.
I've seen the expressions on the faces of younger first-time guests in such
services and their expressions look like children indulging their parents.
Pay attention to the underlying theology of the
music and select music for the liturgy the same way we do with so-called
"traditional" worship.
·
Listen and learn from the astonishing
revelations some younger people give out when they visit an Episcopal Church.
Statements like this, "Wow! I love the silences in the service. "
"I was looking for tradition and I found it here." "I tried one
of those mega-churches but it was like going to a concert. I wanted to go to
church."
·
Consider that attracting more people may not be
the kind of worship but rather the kind of service. Do you have hands-on
service? Is it at times when young singles young couples, and couples with
children can participate? Can their children participate in a meaningful way?
Does it “click” with the passions and abilities of people in the parish? Will
it make a difference in your community or elsewhere?
What all this has taught me is it is much more important to ask
people about their best, deepest, and most fulfilling worship experience and
get them to tell you that story. Then you can look at common elements to design
worship that will be those things. Forget surveys: ask people for stories. If
they have never worshiped before, ask them how they imagine fulfilling worship
would be. Christians are people of the story and we live by stories!
Where technology is concerned, I see major successes with
flat screen televisions in the narthex (foyer) and parish halls or gathering
spaces, and in keeping up with technology for communicating with people. Always
being mindful of those left behind by technology who still want paper, yet
using social networking, multi-person text messaging, and the most current available
methods with those who like best to be communicated with in those ways. I ask
new members how they prefer to get their communications. And yes, it does mean
more work for a parish, but the returns are great.
Please understand. I am no expert. This is simply what I
have distilled from what will soon be fourteen years of ordained ministry as a
vocational interim. The experience is based both in the churches in which I
served and those in which I consulted. I am currently serving in my ninth
interim position. All but one of those churches wrestled with what type of
service to do to attract younger people, or with a contemporary service in some
form. I served in one position, as an associate, that was not a declared
interim position but that was without a doubt my purpose there. I have been
interim rector or vicar or consultant in churches ranging in average Sunday
attendance from Family to Corporate size.
No comments:
Post a Comment